Try it on invented notes · nothing to sign
Every note below is fictional — invented residents, invented service, invented events. There is no account to create, nothing to upload, and no data-sharing agreement to get through governance first, because there is no data.
Read each note, commit to a band before you look, then reveal what NoteCheck said and why. The disagreements are the point. They tell you more about whether this tool matches your standard than any accuracy figure we could quote.
Note 1 of 6
Why this note is in the set
Your turn first
Judge it as you would in a file audit: would this evidence the support charged for?
You ran the pilot exercise in miniature. Blind-grade first, then compare — that ordering is what makes an agreement figure mean anything, and it is exactly how the two-week evaluation works on 40 of your own notes instead of 6 of ours.
Read those first. A disagreement is either a miscalibrated tool or a house habit that an auditor would query — and you cannot tell which until you look at the quotes. That judgement is the one thing no vendor can make for you.
Five assessments are free on signup with no card details. Pseudonymise a handful of your own notes and run them. Beyond that, the two-week pilot puts a number on the agreement rate you just estimated by eye.
All six notes are synthetic and were written for this demo. Any resemblance to a real resident, worker or service is coincidental.
Scored against rubric v3, the NoteCheck Outcome-Based Support Standard — 7 criteria, 0–4 scale, weighted mean, safeguarding gate active.
Bands: Poor below 1.6 · Average 1.6 to 2.99 · Excellent 3.0 and above. The band is arithmetic, not a judgement call.